Sunday, October 22, 2017

The Hypothesis of an Artwork

My young friend Radhika surprised me with her artwork today. I tried paraphrasing our conversation below:

"Did you draw this for me?", I asked.

"Yes" - she said.

"Who is this?", I asked, pointing towards the largest human figure.

"That's you", she said.

"What about this girl?", I asked, pointing towards the small human figure in the sketch.

"That's me", she said.

"Is that a butterfly?", I asked pointing towards the insect like figure on the left.

"NO!, that's a dragonfly; THIS is the butterfly", she said pointing towards the other insect like figure.

"The dragonfly goes over your head, under the butterfly and the butterfly flies over and sits on the floor", she said, describing the motion in the dotted lines near the insects.

"Wow, that's amazing! Why do I look like a scarecrow?", I asked; she dismissed my stupid question.

"Look at the back", she said pointing towards the big alarm clock.

"Is this your clock? What time do you wake up?; It looks like 4pm", I said reading out loud.

"Why is it that your 3, 2 and 9 are mirror images of the numbers", I asked another stupid question.

"That's how I write them", she said dismissing my question.

"But that's not correct, you know that right?", stupid question number infinite at this point.

"Yes, but that's how I want them", she said with her beautiful smile.

"Is this for me? Can I keep this?", I asked her.

"Yes, its' for you", she said.

After this we went downstairs to play some jigsaw puzzle. I ate a delicious meal at her place and like an idiot forgot to take the artwork with me. I asked her mom to send me a photo of those drawings. Now, I can't stop looking at them.

They say Picasso drew like a child even after growing up. His figures had no sense of proportion; it was purely his feelings that came out in his countless sketches and paintings; people say they did not understand it, it was modern art when frankly it was real art unaffected by the dogma of form and art school.




Radhika's gift for me had figures with no conventional sense of proportion except as her minds eye perceived them. The male figure i.e me is the largest figure on her canvas and the centerpiece of the artwork. She wants me to feel important and after all it's a gift! She stands next to me in what I would interpret as a happy position and at the same time taking authorship for the work. The insects add a dynamic to this artwork; there is a sense of motion in this still life which adds an excitement to it. The dragonfly flies over my head, the butterfly flies over the dragonfly and sits on the grass. The tree is small, giving the drawing a sense of depth in field or maybe it's a plant with its leaves stretched out just like the humans have their hands; nature is clearly in unison with humans here. Radhika's world appears large and she has a place for me there! The sun is shown partially, the whole drawing is as if seen through a lens; there are things within the frame and then there are things outside it! Again, a sign of endless possibilities.




The alarm clock has some inverted numbers and that's how Radhika believes they should be in this drawing! She realizes that they don't meet the convention but who cares about conventions in an artwork? The time in the clock is open to interpretation; it could be 4am or 4pm. There are diagonal red lines outside the clock indicating the sound of the alarm!; her mom told me that they brought an alarm clock for her recently and she is fascinated by it. I am glad that she has gifted me her image of the alarm clock by drawing it on the other side of the scene of bliss. I could even take it as the transience of everything in life. Time is after all the fourth dimension that defines our existence.
I won't read into it that much though. I am just glad that my young friend gifted me this! I decided to return the favor by giving it a place on my blog.


Monday, October 16, 2017

The Day After (Dir. Hong Sang Soo, 2017)



(Reviewed 4.5/5 on letterboxd.com in October 2017)


Hong tackles the sensitive subject of extra-marital affair by using humor to show the absurdity of the situation and especially that of the players. One character talks about having faith, one accuses the male protagonist of being a coward, and that character herself is a hypocrite. The cowards and hypocrites are caricatures that cry out loud and will even admit to their cowardice over a drink of soju. Fortunately, the character with faith including the male protagonists wife will survive and even manage to bring a change in the Coward. Hong's caricatured portrait of this trio gives a larger world view of how societies with faiths have survived centuries unlike many other liberal and licentious endeavors. When you have the attitude that everything is beautiful and that everything happens per God's will, the ignorance will continue to keep you in bliss as it has done for societies over countless millennia. Whether you agree with them or not, these people will survive and more often more peacefully than those without faith.

Saturday, October 14, 2017

On the Beach at Night Alone (Dir. Hong Sang Soo, 2017)

(Reviewed 5/5 on letterboxd in October 2017)


Hong's most emotionally wrenching film since Remembering the Turning Gate. I haven't liked his films with female protagonists as much until this one. The drinking/smoking session scenes are less than usual but way more effective. Also got to admire Hong's use of surrealism in humor; never fails to tickle the funny bone. The waves of emotions I felt at the end were so many, i felt like caressing my head like that flower Kim caresses in one of the scenes.

Sunday, October 1, 2017

The Magnificent Matador (Dir. Budd Boetticher, 1955)


(Reviewed 4/5 on letterboxd.com in Oct 2017)


Boetticher shoots bullfight sequences from a tatami mat and makes you wait for it. Add to it two of my favorite Hollywood actors. Just magnificent sexiness. Oh and gotta love that poster!